Amd Vs Nvidia Benchmarks 2016
GPU Benchmarks and Bureaucracy 2022: Graphics Cards Ranked
Our GPU benchmarks hierarchy ranks all the current and previous generation graphics cards past functioning, including all of the best graphics cards. Whether it's playing games or doing high-end artistic piece of work like 4K video editing, your graphics card typically plays the biggest office in determining performance, and even the
best CPUs for Gaminghave a secondary role.
Nosotros've revamped our GPU testbed and updated all of our benchmarks for 2022, and are currently in the procedure of retesting every graphics menu from the by several generations. We have completed testing of the current generation AMD RDNA two and Nvidia Ampere GPUs, and are mostly finished with the Turing and RDNA series every bit well. There are a few other graphics cards in the charts from even older architectures, and we'll go on to add together more than GPUs to the listing as we complete testing.
Nosotros've got the full bureaucracy using traditional rendering commencement, and below that, we have our ray tracing GPU benchmarks. Those of form require a ray tracing capable GPU and then only AMD'due south RX 6000-serial and Nvidia's RTX cards are present. Below our main tables, you'll notice our 2020–2021 benchmark suite, which has all of the previous generation GPUs running our older test suite running on a Core i9-9900K testbed. We as well have the legacy GPU hierarchy (without benchmarks) at the bottom of the commodity.
The following tables sort everything solely by our performance-based GPU gaming benchmarks. Factors including price, graphics carte du jour power consumption, overall efficiency, and other features aren't factored into the rankings hither. The latest additions are the Radeon RX 6500 XT and GeForce RTX 3050, equally well equally the MSI version of the RTX 3080 12GB — note that this has a healthy factory overclock that often pushes it ahead of the RTX 3080 Ti. All that'due south left is for Intel Arc Alchemist to come spoil the political party.
Again, we're in the process of updating all of our testing procedures and results. Nosotros've switched to a new Alder Lake Cadre i9-12900K testbed, inverse upward our test suite, and are retesting all of the by ii generations of GPUs. We've completed the current generation cards and nearly all of the RDNA and Turing GPUs (minus the Titan RTX), and nosotros're now working our mode through the older GPUs and adding those to the listing as we finish testing them.
Graphics Card Deals
Because of both component shortages and skyrocketing demand (due in part to crypto mining), it'southward hard to notice good prices on any graphics card, permit solitary one with a GPU that tops our listing. Yet, nosotros've got a lot of advice on how to find graphics card savings in our RTX 3080 deals, RTX 3070 deals, and RTX 3060 deals pages.
One piece of advice we recommend on all three pages: Consider purchasing a prebuilt laptop or desktop that has your GPU of selection within. You tin either pull the bill of fare and resell the PC or, choose a gaming desktop you really similar and make it a complete upgrade. Here are some quick links to help you find a graphics card deal on a organization if you lot go this route, along with a direct link so you tin can run into what the latest prices are on the open up marketplace.
- Newegg: Up to 26% Off RTX 3060, 3070 and 3080 Desktops
- Best Buy: Up to $400 Off RTX 3060, 3070 and 3080 Laptops
- eBay: Latest deals on RTX 3060, 3070 and 3080 cards
GPU Benchmarks Ranking 2022
For our latest benchmarks, we test all GPUs at 1080p medium and 1080p ultra, and sort the table by the 1080p ultra results. Where information technology makes sense, nosotros besides test at 1440p ultra and 4K ultra. All of the scores are scaled relative to the top-ranking 1080p ultra card, which in our new suite is the Radeon RX 6900 XT. Yous'll notice that the RTX 3090, RTX 3080 Ti, and RTX 3080 12GB all performed amend at 4K ultra, so their scores will be above 100% at that resolution.
You lot tin can also meet the above summary chart showing the relative functioning of the cards we've tested beyond the past several generations of hardware at 1080p ultra. Nosotros are nevertheless in the process of testing older cards, which is why nosotros only accept a few RTX xx-series cards tested right now. Check back over the coming days and we'll be adding additional cards.
The 8 games nosotros're using for our standard GPU benchmarks bureaucracy are Borderlands three (DX12), Far Weep vi (DX12), Flight Simulator (DX12), Forza Horizon 5 (DX12), Horizon Null Dawn (DX12), Cherry Dead Redemption 2 (Vulkan), Total War Warhammer 3 (DX11), and Scout Dogs Legion (DX12). The fps score is the geometric mean (equal weighting) of the eight games.
| Graphics Card | 1080p Ultra | 1080p Medium | 1440p Ultra | 4K Ultra | Specifications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radeon RX 6900 XT | 100.0% (129.2fps) | 100.0% (182.7fps) | 100.0% (105.8fps) | 100.0% (63.0fps) | Navi 21, 5120 shaders, 2250MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 300W |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 96.7% (124.9fps) | 95.9% (175.2fps) | 99.2% (105.0fps) | 107.2% (67.6fps) | GA102, 10496 shaders, 1695MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@19.5Gbps, 936GB/s, 350W |
| GeForce RTX 3080 12GB | 95.three% (123.1fps) | 95.ix% (175.2fps) | 97.1% (102.7fps) | 103.3% (65.1fps) | GA102, 8960 shaders, 1845MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/s, 400W |
| Radeon RX 6800 XT | 95.1% (122.9fps) | 96.9% (177.0fps) | 94.6% (100.1fps) | 92.eight% (58.5fps) | Navi 21, 4608 shaders, 2250MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 300W |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 94.two% (121.7fps) | 94.2% (172.0fps) | 96.five% (102.1fps) | 104.0% (65.6fps) | GA102, 10240 shaders, 1665MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/s, 350W |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | 88.9% (114.8fps) | 93.3% (170.4fps) | 88.8% (94.0fps) | 93.6% (59.0fps) | GA102, 8704 shaders, 1710MHz, 10GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 760GB/s, 320W |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 85.3% (110.2fps) | 93.vii% (171.2fps) | 82.8% (87.6fps) | 80.0% (50.4fps) | Navi 21, 3840 shaders, 2105MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 250W |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 79.seven% (102.9fps) | 87.three% (159.4fps) | 76.9% (81.4fps) | 73.3% (46.2fps) | GA104, 6144 shaders, 1770MHz, 8GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 608GB/s, 290W |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 76.2% (98.4fps) | 84.6% (154.5fps) | 72.1% (76.3fps) | 67.5% (42.5fps) | GA104, 5888 shaders, 1725MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/south, 220W |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 74.3% (96.0fps) | 83.0% (151.6fps) | 71.two% (75.3fps) | 70.8% (44.6fps) | TU102, 4352 shaders, 1545MHz, 11GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 616GB/south, 250W |
| Radeon RX 6700 XT | 73.half dozen% (95.0fps) | 86.7% (158.4fps) | 66.6% (70.5fps) | 61.two% (38.5fps) | Navi 22, 2560 shaders, 2581MHz, 12GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 384GB/due south, 230W |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 69.nine% (ninety.3fps) | 80.1% (146.4fps) | 65.two% (69.0fps) | GA104, 4864 shaders, 1665MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/southward, 200W | |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Super | 65.7% (84.9fps) | 75.5% (137.8fps) | 61.3% (64.9fps) | 54.8% (34.5fps) | TU104, 3072 shaders, 1815MHz, 8GB GDDR6@15.5Gbps, 496GB/s, 250W |
| GeForce RTX 2080 | 63.vi% (82.2fps) | 72.nine% (133.1fps) | 59.0% (62.4fps) | TU104, 2944 shaders, 1710MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 215W | |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | 60.6% (78.3fps) | 74.8% (136.6fps) | 52.2% (55.2fps) | Navi 23, 2048 shaders, 2589MHz, 8GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 256GB/s, 160W | |
| GeForce RTX 2070 Super | 59.2% (76.4fps) | 68.0% (124.1fps) | 54.three% (57.4fps) | TU104, 2560 shaders, 1770MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 215W | |
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | 57.i% (73.7fps) | 68.9% (125.8fps) | 50.4% (53.3fps) | 46.4% (29.3fps) | Navi 10, 2560 shaders, 1905MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 225W |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | 53.7% (69.4fps) | 63.9% (116.8fps) | 49.0% (51.9fps) | GA106, 3584 shaders, 1777MHz, 12GB GDDR6@15Gbps, 360GB/southward, 170W | |
| GeForce RTX 2070 | 52.half-dozen% (67.9fps) | 60.6% (110.7fps) | 48.two% (51.0fps) | TU106, 2304 shaders, 1620MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 175W | |
| Radeon RX 6600 | 51.9% (67.0fps) | 64.5% (117.9fps) | 44.0% (46.5fps) | Navi 23, 1792 shaders, 2491MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 132W | |
| GeForce RTX 2060 Super | 50.four% (65.1fps) | 58.0% (105.9fps) | 45.6% (48.2fps) | TU106, 2176 shaders, 1650MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 175W | |
| Radeon RX 5700 | 50.2% (64.8fps) | threescore.9% (111.3fps) | 44.6% (47.2fps) | Navi 10, 2304 shaders, 1725MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 180W | |
| Radeon RX 5600 XT | 45.0% (58.1fps) | 55.0% (100.6fps) | 39.seven% (42.0fps) | Navi ten, 2304 shaders, 1750MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 336GB/southward, 160W | |
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 42.7% (55.2fps) | 53.0% (96.8fps) | 36.six% (38.7fps) | TU106, 1920 shaders, 1680MHz, 6GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 336GB/southward, 160W | |
| GeForce RTX 3050 | 39.five% (51.0fps) | 48.0% (87.6fps) | 35.two% (37.3fps) | GA106, 2560 shaders, 1777MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/south, 130W | |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Super | 34.4% (44.4fps) | 45.3% (82.8fps) | 29.eight% (31.5fps) | TU116, 1408 shaders, 1785MHz, 6GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 336GB/s, 125W | |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 34.0% (43.9fps) | 44.eight% (81.9fps) | 29.eight% (31.6fps) | TU116, 1536 shaders, 1770MHz, 6GB GDDR6@12Gbps, 288GB/s, 120W | |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | 30.ix% (39.9fps) | 41.1% (75.1fps) | 26.nine% (28.5fps) | TU116, 1408 shaders, 1785MHz, 6GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 192GB/south, 120W | |
| Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB | 30.8% (39.8fps) | 39.7% (72.6fps) | 26.9% (28.5fps) | Navi 14, 1408 shaders, 1845MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/south, 130W | |
| Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB | 25.9% (33.5fps) | 36.6% (66.9fps) | Navi fourteen, 1408 shaders, 1845MHz, 4GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 130W | ||
| GeForce GTX 1650 Super | 25.vii% (33.2fps) | 37.i% (67.9fps) | 21.7% (23.0fps) | TU116, 1280 shaders, 1725MHz, 4GB GDDR6@12Gbps, 192GB/s, 100W | |
| GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | 24.8% (32.1fps) | 31.four% (57.3fps) | 21.5% (22.8fps) | GP106, 1280 shaders, 1708MHz, 6GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 192GB/s, 120W | |
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | 23.8% (thirty.8fps) | 36.1% (65.9fps) | xvi.vii% (17.7fps) | Navi 24, 1024 shaders, 2815MHz, 4GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 144GB/s, 107W | |
| Radeon RX 570 4GB | 21.9% (28.3fps) | 29.four% (53.6fps) | xviii.9% (20.0fps) | Polaris xx, 2048 shaders, 1244MHz, 4GB GDDR5@7Gbps, 224GB/s, 150W | |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | 20.6% (26.6fps) | 28.0% (51.1fps) | TU117, 896 shaders, 1665MHz, 4GB GDDR5@8Gbps, 128GB/s, 75W |
Our updated test suite and testbed cease upward favoring AMD'due south GPUs slightly, particularly at 1080p and fifty-fifty 1440p. The RX 6800 XT joins its big brother at the top of the chart, surpassing Nvidia's current all-time, the RTX 3090. That'south a potentially big accident to Nvidia, but keep in listen that we're not including any ray tracing or DLSS results in the above table, as we intend to utilize the same test suite with the aforementioned settings on all current and previous generation graphics cards. Similarly, the RX 6800 beats the RTX 3070 Ti, while the RTX 3070 and RX 6700 XT are effectively tied.
The rankings favor AMD less at the lower portion of the chart, with the RTX 3060 and RX 6600 too tied, and the RTX 3050 easily eclipses the RX 6500 XT — not that it'southward difficult to do and then, as both the 4GB and 8GB RX 5500 XT also shell AMD's latest budget offering.
Turning to the previous generation GPUs, the RTX xx-series and GTX xvi-series chips end upwardly scattered throughout the results, along with the RX 5000-series. The general rule of thumb is that you get one or two "model upgrades" with the newer compages, and then for case the RTX 2080 Super comes in simply below the RTX 3060 Ti, while the RX 5700 XT lands a few pct behind the RX 6600 XT. We only have a couple of cards from fifty-fifty older generations, just nosotros'll be fleshing things out over the coming weeks with the RX 500/Vega and GTX 10-series graphics cards.
Now let'south switch over to the ray tracing hierarchy.
Ray Tracing GPU Benchmarks Ranking 2022
Enabling ray tracing, particularly with demanding games like those we're using in our DXR test suite, can cause framerates to drib off a cliff. Nosotros're testing with "medium" and "ultra" ray tracing settings. Medium means using medium graphics settings merely turning on some of the ray tracing effects, while ultra turns on all of the RT options.
Because ray tracing is and then much more than enervating, we're sorting these results by the 1080p medium scores. That'southward also because the RX 6500 XT basically can't handle ray tracing, and testing at annihilation more 1080p medium would be fruitless. We've finished with all the electric current ray tracing capable GPUs, for at present, with the exception of the Titan RTX — we'll add that equally well at some point in the coming days.
The half-dozen ray tracing games nosotros're using are Brilliant Memory Space, Control Ultimate Edition, Cyberpunk 2077, Fortnite, Metro Exodus Enhanced, and Minecraft — all of these utilise the DirectX 12 / DX12 Ultimate API. The fps score is the geometric mean (equal weighting) of the six games, and the pct is scaled relative to the fastest GPU in the listing, which in this instance is the GeForce RTX 3090.
| Graphics Card | 1080p Medium | 1080p Ultra | 1440p Ultra | 4K Ultra | Specifications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3090 | 100.0% (108.4fps) | 100.0% (75.7fps) | 100.0% (50.8fps) | 100.0% (25.4fps) | GA102, 10496 shaders, 1695MHz, 24GB GDDR6X@19.5Gbps, 936GB/s, 350W |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 97.4% (105.6fps) | 97.6% (73.9fps) | 97.0% (49.2fps) | 97.0% (24.7fps) | GA102, 10240 shaders, 1665MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/s, 350W |
| GeForce RTX 3080 12GB | 96.6% (104.7fps) | 95.half-dozen% (72.4fps) | 94.four% (47.9fps) | 93.iv% (23.7fps) | GA102, 8960 shaders, 1845MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/southward, 400W |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | 88.9% (96.3fps) | 87.five% (66.3fps) | 86.ane% (43.7fps) | 82.eight% (21.0fps) | GA102, 8704 shaders, 1710MHz, 10GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 760GB/south, 320W |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | 72.iv% (78.4fps) | 70.2% (53.1fps) | 66.seven% (33.9fps) | GA104, 6144 shaders, 1770MHz, 8GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 608GB/south, 290W | |
| Radeon RX 6900 XT | 68.viii% (74.5fps) | 65.seven% (49.8fps) | 62.two% (31.6fps) | 59.2% (fifteen.1fps) | Navi 21, 5120 shaders, 2250MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 300W |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | 67.8% (73.4fps) | 65.v% (49.6fps) | 61.nine% (31.4fps) | GA104, 5888 shaders, 1725MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 220W | |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 64.six% (70.0fps) | 61.iv% (46.5fps) | 58.half dozen% (29.7fps) | TU102, 4352 shaders, 1545MHz, 11GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 616GB/due south, 250W | |
| Radeon RX 6800 XT | 64.3% (69.7fps) | 60.9% (46.1fps) | 57.8% (29.4fps) | 55.ii% (14.0fps) | Navi 21, 4608 shaders, 2250MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 300W |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 60.ii% (65.3fps) | 57.2% (43.3fps) | 53.9% (27.4fps) | GA104, 4864 shaders, 1665MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 200W | |
| Radeon RX 6800 | 55.0% (59.6fps) | 51.nine% (39.3fps) | 49.1% (24.9fps) | Navi 21, 3840 shaders, 2105MHz, 16GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 512GB/s, 250W | |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Super | 54.1% (58.6fps) | 50.1% (37.9fps) | 46.9% (23.8fps) | TU104, 3072 shaders, 1815MHz, 8GB GDDR6@15.5Gbps, 496GB/s, 250W | |
| GeForce RTX 2080 | 51.8% (56.2fps) | 47.4% (35.9fps) | 44.1% (22.4fps) | TU104, 2944 shaders, 1710MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 215W | |
| GeForce RTX 2070 Super | 47.five% (51.5fps) | 43.7% (33.1fps) | 40.0% (20.3fps) | TU104, 2560 shaders, 1770MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 215W | |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | 45.0% (48.7fps) | 42.half dozen% (32.3fps) | 39.half-dozen% (twenty.1fps) | GA106, 3584 shaders, 1777MHz, 12GB GDDR6@15Gbps, 360GB/south, 170W | |
| Radeon RX 6700 XT | 42.4% (45.9fps) | twoscore.iii% (30.5fps) | 36.7% (18.7fps) | Navi 22, 2560 shaders, 2581MHz, 12GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 384GB/southward, 230W | |
| GeForce RTX 2070 | 42.0% (45.5fps) | 38.viii% (29.4fps) | 35.7% (xviii.1fps) | TU106, 2304 shaders, 1620MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/southward, 175W | |
| GeForce RTX 2060 Super | twoscore.3% (43.6fps) | 36.viii% (27.9fps) | 33.seven% (17.1fps) | TU106, 2176 shaders, 1650MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 448GB/s, 175W | |
| GeForce RTX 2060 | 34.7% (37.6fps) | 29.7% (22.5fps) | TU106, 1920 shaders, 1680MHz, 6GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 336GB/s, 160W | ||
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | 33.6% (36.4fps) | 31.two% (23.6fps) | Navi 23, 2048 shaders, 2589MHz, 8GB GDDR6@16Gbps, 256GB/s, 160W | ||
| GeForce RTX 3050 | 32.1% (34.8fps) | 30.1% (22.8fps) | GA106, 2560 shaders, 1777MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/south, 130W | ||
| Radeon RX 6600 | 28.ii% (xxx.5fps) | 26.0% (19.6fps) | Navi 23, 1792 shaders, 2491MHz, 8GB GDDR6@14Gbps, 224GB/s, 132W | ||
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | viii.6% (nine.4fps) | Navi 24, 1024 shaders, 2815MHz, 4GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 144GB/s, 107W |
Where AMD took the meridian 2 spots in our standard test suite, once we enable ray tracing, the best AMD can do is 6th identify, just barely ahead of the RTX 3070. That likewise puts the RX 6900 XT ahead of Nvidia's previous generation RTX 2080 Ti, just not by much. It's a precipitous drop, and we're not even using DLSS, which all six of our DXR games support.
Yous can see what DLSS Quality mode did for operation on the MSI RTX 3080 12GB in our review, simply the short summary is that information technology additional performance by l% at 1080p ultra, 67% at 1440p ultra, and 96% at 4K ultra — with that last taking performance from an unplayable 26 fps boilerplate to a comfortable 51 fps. You lot can also legitimately use the Counterbalanced and Performance modes without killing image quality, especially at 4K, which will deliver even larger gains.
Without some class of upscaling, AMD's fastest GPUs can barely manage 1440p at more than than 30 fps, and none of the GPUs tin can handle native 4K. Just the RTX 3080 was 45% faster than the RX 6900 XT, and the RTX 3090 was 72% faster. Hopefully the upcoming Nvidia Ada and AMD RDNA 3 GPUs will be able to handle 4K at native resolution while reaching playable framerates, but even then we expect DLSS or some other upscaling algorithm will exist necessary for 60 fps or more.
The midrange GPUs like the RTX 3070 and RX 6700 XT basically manage 1080p ultra and not much more, while the bottom tier of DXR-capable GPUs barely manage 1080p medium — and the RX 6500 XT tin't even do that, with single digit framerates in nearly of our examination suite, and 1 game that wouldn't fifty-fifty work at our called "medium" settings. (Command requires at least 6GB VRAM to allow yous enabled ray tracing.)
Information technology's also interesting to look at the generational performance of Nvidia's RTX cards. The slowest 20-serial GPU, the RTX 2060, still outperforms the new RTX 3050 by a bit, simply the fastest RTX 2080 Ti comes in a bit behind the RTX 3070. Where the 2080 Ti basically doubled the performance of the 2060, the 3090 delivers about triple the operation of the 3050.
2020-2021 GPU Benchmarks Ranking
The results beneath are from our previous version of the GPU benchmarks hierarchy, using a different test suite and combining results from ix games with vi resolution and setting combinations. All of the scores are combined (via a geometric mean calculation) into a single overall effect, which tends to penalize the fastest and slowest GPUs — CPU bottlenecks come into play at 1080p medium, while VRAM limitations can kill functioning at 4K ultra. These results accept not been updated since early on 2022, when nosotros added the RTX 3050 and RX 6500 XT to the listing. While we work to cease testing of the other GPUs on our new examination suite, you tin can use these older results to help inform your purchase decisions.
Choosing a Graphics Card
Which graphics bill of fare do y'all need? To help you make up one's mind, we created this GPU benchmarks hierarchy consisting of dozens of GPUs from the past four generations of hardware. Not surprisingly, the fastest cards use either Nvidia's Ampere architecture or AMD'south Big Navi. AMD's latest graphics cards perform well without ray tracing, but tend to fall behind one time RT gets enabled — fifty-fifty more than then if you enable DLSS, which you should. GPU prices are even so a massive hindrance to upgrading, unfortunately, and we're likely at to the lowest degree half dozen months abroad from striking somewhat reasonable levels.
Of course it'southward not merely well-nigh playing games. Many applications employ the GPU for other work, and we covered some professional GPU benchmarks in our RTX 3090 review. Only a skilful graphics carte du jour for gaming will typically do every bit well in complex GPU computational workloads. Purchase ane of the top cards and you can run games at high resolutions and frame rates with the effects turned all the fashion up, and y'all'll exist able to do content creation work every bit well. Drop down to the middle and lower portions of the list and you'll demand to commencement dialing down the settings to become acceptable performance in regular game play and GPU benchmarks.
It'due south non only about loftier-cease GPUs either, of grade. Nosotros tested Intel'due south Xe Graphics DG1, which basically competes with integrated graphics solutions. The results weren't pretty, and we didn't even try running whatever of those at settings beyond 1080p medium. Yet, y'all can encounter where those GPUs state at the very bottom of the 2020-2021 GPU benchmarks list. Thankfully, Intel's Arc Alchemist, aka DG2, appears to be cutting from entirely different cloth.
If your main goal is gaming, you tin't forget about the CPU. Getting the best possible gaming GPU won't help you much if your CPU is underpowered and/or out of date. So be certain to check out the All-time CPUs for gaming page, as well equally our CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy to make certain you have the correct CPU for the level of gaming you're looking to achieve.
Examination Organization and How We Test for GPU Benchmarks
We've used two dissimilar PCs for our testing. The latest 2022 and later configuration uses an Alder Lake CPU and platform, while our previous testbed uses Coffee Lake and Z390. Here are the details of the ii PCs.
Tom's Hardware 2022 GPU Testbed
Intel Core i9-12900K
MSI Pro Z690-A WiFi DDR4
Corsair 2x16GB DDR4-3600 CL16
Crucial P5 Plus 2TB
Libation Master MWE 1250 V2 Gilt
Libation Master PL360 Flux
Libation Primary HAF500
Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
Tom's Hardware 2020–2021 GPU Testbed
Intel Core i9-9900K
Corsair H150i Pro RGB
MSI MEG Z390 Ace
Corsair 2x16GB DDR4-3200
XPG SX8200 Pro 2TB
Windows 10 Pro (21H1)
For each graphics carte, nosotros follow the same testing procedure. We run one laissez passer of each benchmark to "warm upward" the GPU after launching the game, then run at to the lowest degree 2 passes at each setting/resolution combination. If the two runs are basically identical (within 0.5% or less difference), nosotros use the faster of the two runs. If in that location's more than a small difference, nosotros run the test at least twice more than to determine what "normal" operation is supposed to be.
We also look at all the information and cheque for anomalies, then for case RTX 3070 Ti, RTX 3070, and RTX 3060 Ti all generally going to perform within a narrow range — 3070 Ti is about 5% faster than 3070, which is most 5% faster than 3060 Ti. If nosotros see games where there are clear outliers (i.due east. performance is more than than 10% higher for the cards but mentioned), we'll go back and retest whatever cards are showing the anomaly and figure out what the "correct" result would be.
Due to the length of time required for testing each GPU, updated drivers and game patches inevitably will come out that can impact performance. Nosotros periodically retest a few sample cards to verify our results are still valid, and if not, we go through and retest the affected game(s) and GPU(s). Nosotros may also add together games to our test suite over the coming year, if one comes out that is pop and conducive to testing — see our what makes a expert game benchmark for our selection criteria.
GPU Benchmarks: Individual Game Charts
The to a higher place tables provide a summary of performance, but for those that want to run into the individual game charts, for both the standard and ray tracing exam suites, we've got those as well. These charts were upward-to-date equally of March 14, 2022, with testing conducted using the latest Nvidia 511.79 and AMD 22.2.2 drivers in most cases, though some of the cards were tested with 511.65 or 22.2.1 (merely all Warhammer 3 and Cyberpunk 2077 testing used the latest drivers).
Legacy GPU Hierarchy
Below is our legacy desktop GPU hierarchy dating back to the 1990s. Nosotros take not tested most of these cards in many years, driver support has concluded on nigh of these models, and the relative rankings are pretty coarse. Annotation that we also don't cistron in memory bandwidth or features like AMD'due south Infinity Cache. The list beneath is generally intended to show relative performance betwixt architectures from a similar time period.
We sorted the table by the theoretical GFLOPS, though on architectures that don't support unified shaders, we just have data for "Gops/southward." That's GeForce vii and Radeon X1000 and before — basically anything from before 2007. We've put an asterisk (*) next to the GPU names for those cards, and they comprise the latter part of the table. Comparing pre-2007 GPUs against each other should be relatively meaningful, but trying to compare those older GPUs against newer GPUs gets a bit convoluted.
| GPU | Release Date | Architecture | Shaders | Clockspeed | GFLOPS (GOps) | Launch Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 3090 | September 2020 | GA102 | 10496 | 1695 | 35,581 | $1,499 |
| GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | June 2021 | GA102 | 10240 | 1665 | 34,099 | $one,249 |
| GeForce RTX 3080 12GB | Jan 2022 | GA102 | 8960 | 1710 | 30,643 | $1,199 |
| GeForce RTX 3080 | September 2020 | GA102 | 8704 | 1710 | 29,768 | $699 |
| Radeon RX 6900 XT | Dec 2020 | Navi 21 | 5120 | 2250 | 23,040 | $999 |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | June 2021 | GA104 | 6144 | 1770 | 21,750 | $599 |
| Radeon RX 6800 XT | November 2020 | Navi 21 | 4608 | 2250 | twenty,736 | $649 |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | October 2020 | GA104 | 5888 | 1725 | 20,314 | $499 |
| Nvidia Titan RTX | Dec 2018 | TU102 | 4608 | 1770 | 16,312 | $two,499 |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | December 2020 | GA104 | 4864 | 1665 | sixteen,197 | $399 |
| Radeon RX 6800 | November 2020 | Navi 21 | 3840 | 2105 | sixteen,166 | $579 |
| Nvidia Titan V | December 2017 | GV100 | 5120 | 1455 | 14,899 | $two,999 |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | September 2018 | TU102 | 4352 | 1545 | xiii,448 | $1,199 |
| Radeon VII | Feb 2019 | Vega twenty | 3840 | 1750 | 13,440 | $699 |
| Radeon RX 6700 XT | March 2021 | Navi 22 | 2560 | 2581 | 13,215 | $479 |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | February 2021 | GA106 | 3584 | 1777 | 12,738 | $329 |
| Radeon RX Vega 64 | August 2017 | Vega x | 4096 | 1546 | 12,665 | $499 |
| Radeon R9 295X2 | April 2014 | Vesuvius (x2) | 5632 | 1018 | 11,467 | $i,499 |
| Nvidia Titan Xp | April 2017 | GP102 | 3840 | 1480 | eleven,366 | $i,199 |
| GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | March 2017 | GP102 | 3584 | 1582 | 11,340 | $699 |
| GeForce RTX 2080 Super | July 2019 | TU104 | 3072 | 1815 | 11,151 | $699 |
| Nvidia Titan X (Pascal) | August 2016 | GP102 | 3584 | 1531 | 10,974 | $i,199 |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | August 2021 | Navi 23 | 2048 | 2589 | 10,605 | $379 |
| Radeon RX Vega 56 | August 2017 | Vega 10 | 3584 | 1471 | ten,544 | $399 |
| GeForce GTX Titan Z | May 2014 | 2x GK110 | 5760 | 876 | 10,092 | $2,999 |
| GeForce RTX 2080 | September 2018 | TU104 | 2944 | 1710 | 10,068 | $699 |
| Radeon RX 5700 XT | July 2019 | Navi 10 | 2560 | 1905 | 9,754 | $399 |
| GeForce RTX 3050 | January 2022 | GA106 | 2560 | 1777 | 9,098 | $249 |
| GeForce RTX 2070 Super | July 2019 | TU104 | 2560 | 1770 | 9,062 | $499 |
| Radeon RX 6600 | October 2021 | Navi 23 | 1792 | 2491 | 8,928 | $329 |
| GeForce GTX 1080 | May 2016 | GP104 | 2560 | 1733 | 8,873 | $599 ($499) |
| Radeon R9 Fury X | June 2015 | Fiji | 4096 | 1050 | viii,602 | $649 |
| Radeon R9 Nano | August 2015 | Republic of the fiji islands | 4096 | g | 8,192 | $649 |
| Radeon HD 7990 | April 2013 | New Zealand (x2) | 4096 | 1000 | 8,192 | $1,000 |
| GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Nov 2017 | GP104 | 2432 | 1683 | eight,186 | $449 |
| Radeon RX 5600 XT | January 2020 | Navi 10 | 2304 | 1750 | viii,064 | $279 |
| Radeon RX 5700 | July 2019 | Navi ten | 2304 | 1725 | vii,949 | $249 |
| GeForce RTX 2070 | October 2018 | TU106 | 2304 | 1620 | vii,465 | $499 |
| GeForce RTX 2060 Super | July 2019 | TU106 | 2176 | 1650 | vii,181 | $399 |
| Radeon R9 Fury | July 2015 | Republic of the fiji islands | 3584 | chiliad | vii,168 | $549 |
| Radeon RX 590 | Nov 2018 | Polaris xxx | 2304 | 1545 | vii,119 | $279 |
| GeForce GTX Titan Ten (Maxwell) | March 2015 | GM200 | 3072 | 1075 | half-dozen,605 | $999 |
| GeForce GTX 1070 | June 2016 | GP104 | 1920 | 1683 | vi,463 | $379 |
| GeForce RTX 2060 | January 2019 | TU106 | 1920 | 1680 | 6,451 | $349 |
| GeForce GTX 690 | April 2012 | 2x GK104 | 3072 | 1019 | 6,261 | $1,000 |
| Radeon RX 580 8GB | April 2017 | Polaris 20 | 2304 | 1340 | half dozen,175 | $229 |
| Radeon RX 580 4GB | April 2017 | Polaris twenty | 2304 | 1340 | 6,175 | $199 |
| GeForce GTX 980 Ti | June 2015 | GM200 | 2816 | 1075 | 6,054 | $649 |
| Radeon R9 390X | June 2015 | Grenada | 2816 | 1050 | v,914 | $429 |
| Radeon RX 480 8GB | June 2016 | Ellesmere | 2304 | 1266 | 5,834 | $239 |
| Radeon RX 480 4GB | June 2016 | Ellesmere | 2304 | 1266 | v,834 | $199 |
| Radeon RX 6500 XT | January 2022 | Navi 24 | 1024 | 2815 | 5,765 | $199 |
| GeForce GTX Titan Black | February 2014 | GK110 | 2880 | 980 | 5,645 | $999 |
| Radeon R9 290X | October 2013 | Hawaii | 2816 | one thousand | v,632 | $549 |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | February 2019 | TU116 | 1536 | 1770 | 5,437 | $279 |
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | November 2013 | GK110 | 2880 | 928 | 5,345 | $699 |
| Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB | Dec 2019 | Navi xiv | 1408 | 1845 | v,196 | $199 |
| Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB | December 2019 | Navi 14 | 1408 | 1845 | 5,196 | $169 |
| Radeon R9 390 | June 2015 | Grenada | 2560 | 1000 | 5,120 | $329 |
| Radeon Hard disk 6990 | March 2011 | Antilles (2x) | 3072 | 830 | 5,100 | $699 |
| Radeon RX 570 8GB | Apr 2017 | Polaris 20 | 2048 | 1244 | 5,095 | $199 |
| Radeon RX 570 4GB | April 2017 | Polaris 20 | 2048 | 1244 | five,095 | $169 |
| GeForce GTX 1660 Super | October 2019 | TU116 | 1408 | 1785 | 5,027 | $229 |
| GeForce GTX 980 | September 2014 | GM204 | 2048 | 1216 | 4,981 | $549 |
| Radeon RX 470 4GB | August 2016 | Ellesmere | 2048 | 1206 | iv,940 | $179 |
| GeForce GTX 1660 | March 2019 | TU116 | 1408 | 1725 | iv,858 | $219 |
| Radeon R9 290 | November 2013 | Hawaii | 2560 | 947 | 4,849 | $399 |
| GeForce GTX Titan | February 2013 | GK110 | 2688 | 876 | 4,709 | $999 |
| Radeon HD 5970 | November 2009 | Hemlock (2x) | 3200 | 725 | 4,640 | $599 |
| GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | July 2016 | GP106 | 1280 | 1708 | 4,372 | $249 |
| Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition | June 2012 | Tahiti | 2048 | 1050 | 4,301 | $500 |
| GeForce GTX 780 | May 2013 | GK110 | 2304 | 900 | 4,147 | $649 ($499) |
| Radeon R9 280X | August 2013 | Tahiti | 2048 | 1000 | four,096 | $299 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Super | November 2019 | TU116 | 1280 | 1590 | iv,070 | $159 |
| Radeon R9 380X | November 2015 | Tonga | 2048 | 970 | 3,973 | $229 |
| GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | August 2016 | GP106 | 1152 | 1708 | three,935 | $199 |
| GeForce GTX 970 | September 2014 | GM204 | 1664 | 1178 | three,920 | $329 |
| Radeon R9 380 | June 2015 | Tonga | 1792 | 970 | iii,476 | $199 |
| Radeon R9 280 | March 2014 | Tahiti | 1792 | 933 | three,344 | $249 |
| GeForce GTX 770 | May 2013 | GK104 | 1536 | 1085 | 3,333 | $399 ($329) |
| Radeon R9 285 | September 2014 | Tonga | 1792 | 918 | three,290 | $249 |
| GeForce GTX 680 | March 2012 | GK104 | 1536 | 1058 | three,250 | $500 |
| Radeon HD 7870 XT | November 2012 | Tahiti | 1536 | 975 | 2,995 | $270 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | April 2019 | TU117 | 896 | 1665 | ii,984 | $149 |
| Radeon HD 7950 | Jan 2012 | Tahiti | 1792 | 800 | ii,867 | $450 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 | Apr 2020 | TU117 | 896 | 1590 | ii,849 | $149 |
| Radeon Hard disk drive 5870 | September 2009 | Cypress | 1600 | 850 | 2,720 | $379 |
| Radeon HD 6970 | December 2010 | Cayman | 1536 | 880 | 2,703 | $369 |
| Radeon R9 270X | August 2013 | Pitcairn | 1280 | 1050 | two,688 | $199 |
| GeForce GTX 760 Ti | September 2013 | GK104 | 1344 | 980 | 2,634 | OEM |
| GeForce GTX 670 | May 2012 | GK104 | 1344 | 980 | 2,634 | $400 |
| GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Baronial 2012 | GK104 | 1344 | 980 | 2,634 | $300 |
| Radeon RX 560 4GB | May 2017 | Baffin | 1024 | 1275 | 2,611 | $99 |
| Radeon R9 370X | August 2015 | Pitcairn | 1280 | m | 2,560 | $179 |
| Radeon HD 7870 | March 2012 | Pitcairn | 1280 | thousand | 2,560 | $350 |
| GeForce GTX 590 | March 2011 | 2x GF110 | 1024 | 607 | 2,486 | $699 |
| GeForce GTX 960 | January 2015 | GM206 | 1024 | 1178 | 2,413 | $199 |
| Radeon Hd 4870 X2 | Baronial 2008 | 2x RV770 | 1600 | 750 | 2,400 | $449 |
| GeForce GTX 760 | June 2013 | GK104 | 1152 | 1033 | 2,380 | $249 |
| Radeon R9 270 | November 2013 | Pitcairn | 1280 | 925 | 2,368 | $179 |
| Radeon HD 6950 2GB | December 2010 | Cayman | 1408 | 800 | two,253 | $299 |
| Radeon HD 6950 1GB | December 2010 | Cayman | 1408 | 800 | 2,253 | $259 |
| Radeon RX 460 4GB | August 2016 | Baffin | 896 | 1200 | 2,150 | $139 |
| Radeon RX 460 2GB | August 2016 | Baffin | 896 | 1200 | 2,150 | $109 |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Oct 2016 | GP107 | 768 | 1392 | 2,138 | $139 |
| Radeon RX 560 4GB | October 2017 | Baffin | 896 | 1175 | 2,106 | $99 |
| Radeon HD 5850 | September 2009 | Cypress | 1440 | 725 | 2,088 | $259 |
| Radeon HD 6870 | October 2010 | Barts | 1120 | 900 | 2,016 | $239 |
| Radeon HD 4850 X2 | November 2008 | 2x RV770 | 1600 | 625 | 2,000 | $339 |
| Radeon R9 370 | June 2015 | Pitcairn | 1024 | 975 | 1,997 | $149 |
| GeForce GTX 660 | September 2012 | GK106 | 960 | 1032 | 1,981 | $230 |
| Radeon R7 260X | Baronial 2013 | Bonaire | 896 | 1100 | 1,971 | $139 |
| GeForce GTX 1050 | October 2016 | GP107 | 640 | 1518 | 1,943 | $109 |
| Radeon R7 265 | Feb 2014 | Pitcairn | 1024 | 925 | 1,894 | $149 |
| GeForce GTX 950 | August 2015 | GM206 | 768 | 1188 | 1,825 | $159 |
| Radeon Hard disk 7790 | March 2013 | Pitcairn | 896 | thousand | 1,792 | $150 |
| Radeon HD 5830 | February 2010 | Cypress | 1120 | 800 | 1,792 | $239 |
| Radeon HD 7850 | March 2012 | Pitcairn | 1024 | 860 | 1,761 | $250 |
| Radeon R7 360 | June 2015 | Bonaire | 768 | 1050 | 1,613 | $109 |
| GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | March 2013 | GK106 | 768 | 1032 | 1,585 | $170 |
| GeForce GTX 580 | November 2010 | GF110 | 512 | 772 | 1,581 | $499 |
| Radeon R7 260 | December 2013 | Bonaire | 768 | 1000 | 1,536 | $109 |
| Radeon RX 550 | Apr 2017 | Lexa | 640 | 1183 | one,514 | $79 |
| Radeon HD 6850 | October 2010 | Barts | 960 | 775 | i,488 | $179 |
| GeForce GTX 650 Ti | October 2012 | GK106 | 768 | 928 | one,425 | $150 |
| GeForce GTX 570 | Dec 2010 | GF110 | 480 | 732 | one,405 | $349 |
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti | Feb 2014 | GK107 | 640 | 1085 | 1,389 | $149 |
| Radeon Hd 6770 | April 2011 | Juniper | 800 | 850 | 1,360 | $129 |
| Radeon Hard disk drive 5770 | October 2009 | Juniper | 800 | 850 | i,360 | $159 |
| Radeon Hard disk 4890 | April 2009 | RV790 | 800 | 850 | ane,360 | $249 |
| GeForce GTX 480 | March 2010 | GF100 | 480 | 701 | 1,346 | $499 |
| Radeon Hd 6790 | Apr 2011 | Barts | 800 | 840 | 1,344 | $149 |
| GeForce GTX 560 Ti (448 Core) | November 2011 | GF110 | 448 | 732 | ane,312 | $289 |
| Radeon Hard disk 7770 | February 2012 | Cape verde | 640 | grand | ane,280 | $160 |
| GeForce GTX 560 Ti | January 2011 | GF114 | 384 | 822 | 1,263 | $249 |
| Radeon Hd 4870 | June 2008 | RV770 | 800 | 750 | 1,200 | $299 |
| GeForce GT 1030 (GDDR5) | May 2017 | GP108 | 384 | 1468 | 1,127 | $70 |
| GeForce GTX 750 | Feb 2014 | GK107 | 512 | 1085 | one,111 | $119 |
| GeForce GTX 470 | March 2010 | GF100 | 448 | 608 | 1,090 | $349 |
| GeForce GTX 560 | May 2011 | GF114 | 336 | 810 | 1,089 | $199 |
| GeForce GT 1030 (DDR4) | March 2018 | GP108 | 384 | 1379 | 1,059 | $79 |
| Radeon Hd 3870 X2 | January 2008 | 2x R680 | 640 | 825 | i,056 | $449 |
| Radeon HD 6750 | January 2011 | Juniper | 720 | 700 | 1,008 | OEM |
| Radeon HD 5750 | October 2009 | Juniper | 720 | 700 | ane,008 | $129 |
| Radeon Hard disk 4850 | June 2008 | RV770 | 800 | 625 | 1,000 | $199 |
| Radeon HD 4770 | April 2009 | RV740 | 640 | 750 | 960 | $109 |
| Radeon R7 350 | February 2016 | Cape Verde | 512 | 925 | 947 | $89 |
| Radeon HD 7750 (GDDR5) | February 2012 | Cape Verde | 512 | 900 | 922 | $110 |
| Radeon HD 7750 (DDR3) | February 2012 | Cape Verde | 512 | 900 | 922 | $110 |
| GeForce GTX 460 (256-bit) | July 2010 | GF104 | 336 | 675 | 907 | $229 |
| GeForce GTX 460 (192-bit) | July 2010 | GF104 | 336 | 675 | 907 | $199 |
| GeForce GTX 465 | May 2010 | GF100 | 352 | 608 | 856 | $279 |
| GeForce GTX 560 SE | Feb 2012 | GF114 | 288 | 736 | 848 | OEM |
| Radeon R7 250E | December 2013 | Republic of cape verde | 512 | 800 | 819 | $109 |
| GeForce GTX 650 | September 2012 | GK107 | 384 | 1058 | 813 | $110 |
| Radeon R7 250 (GDDR5) | August 2013 | Oland | 384 | 1050 | 806 | $99 |
| Radeon R7 250 (DDR3) | August 2013 | Oland | 384 | 1050 | 806 | $89 |
| Radeon Hard disk 6670 (GDDR5) | April 2011 | Turks | 480 | 800 | 768 | $109 |
| Radeon Hard disk drive 6670 (DDR3) | April 2011 | Turks | 480 | 800 | 768 | $99 |
| GeForce 9800 GX2 | March 2008 | 2x G92 | 256 | 1500 | 768 | |
| GeForce GT 740 (GDDR5) | May 2014 | GK107 | 384 | 993 | 763 | $99 |
| GeForce GT 740 (DDR3) | May 2014 | GK107 | 384 | 993 | 763 | $89 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Nov 2010 | GF104 | 288 | 650 | 749 | $160 |
| Radeon HD 4830 | October 2008 | RV770 | 640 | 575 | 736 | $130 |
| GeForce GT 640 (GDDR5) | April 2012 | GK107 | 384 | 950 | 730 | OEM |
| GeForce GT 730 (64-fleck, GDDR5) | June 2014 | GK208 | 384 | 902 | 693 | $79 |
| GeForce GT 730 (64-fleck, DDR3) | June 2014 | GK208 | 384 | 902 | 693 | $69 |
| GeForce GTX 550 Ti | March 2011 | GF116 | 192 | 900 | 691 | $149 |
| Radeon HD 6570 (GDDR5) | April 2011 | Turks | 480 | 650 | 624 | $89 |
| Radeon HD 6570 (DDR3) | Apr 2011 | Turks | 480 | 650 | 624 | $79 |
| Radeon HD 5670 | January 2010 | Redwood | 400 | 775 | 620 | $99 |
| Radeon Hd 7730 (GDDR5) | April 2013 | Cape Verde | 384 | 800 | 614 | $60 |
| Radeon HD 7730 (DDR3) | April 2013 | Cape Verde | 384 | 800 | 614 | $sixty |
| GeForce GT 640 (DDR3) | Apr 2012 | GK107 | 384 | 797 | 612 | OEM |
| GeForce GTS 450 | September 2010 | GF106 | 192 | 783 | 601 | $129 |
| GeForce GTX 295 | January 2009 | 2x GT200 | 480 | 576 | 553 | $500 |
| Radeon Hd 5570 (GDDR5) | February 2010 | Redwood | 400 | 650 | 520 | $80 |
| Radeon Hd 5570 (DDR3) | February 2010 | Redwood | 400 | 650 | 520 | $fourscore |
| GeForce GT 545 (GDDR5) | May 2011 | GF116 | 144 | 870 | 501 | OEM |
| Radeon R7 240 | August 2013 | Oland | 320 | 780 | 499 | $69 |
| Radeon HD 3870 | November 2007 | RV670 | 320 | 777 | 497 | $349 |
| Radeon HD 4670 | September 2008 | RV730 | 320 | 750 | 480 | $79 |
| Radeon HD 2900 XT | May 2007 | R600 | 320 | 743 | 476 | $399 |
| GeForce GTS 250 | March 2009 | G92b | 128 | 1836 | 470 | $150 |
| GeForce 9800 GTX+ | July 2008 | G92b | 128 | 1836 | 470 | |
| GeForce 9800 GTX | April 2008 | G92 | 128 | 1688 | 432 | |
| Radeon HD 3850 (512MB) | November 2007 | RV670 | 320 | 668 | 428 | $189 |
| Radeon Hard disk 3850 (256MB) | Nov 2007 | RV670 | 320 | 668 | 428 | $179 |
| Radeon HD 3830 | April 2008 | RV670 | 320 | 668 | 428 | $129 |
| Radeon Hd 4650 (DDR3) | September 2008 | RV730 | 320 | 650 | 416 | |
| GeForce 8800 GTS (512MB) | December 2007 | G92 | 128 | 1625 | 416 | |
| GeForce GT 545 (DDR3) | May 2011 | GF116 | 144 | 720 | 415 | $149 |
| Radeon Hd 4650 (DDR2) | September 2008 | RV730 | 320 | 600 | 384 | |
| Radeon Hd 2900 Pro | September 2007 | R600 | 320 | 600 | 384 | $300 |
| GeForce 8800 Ultra | May 2007 | G80 | 128 | 1500 | 384 | |
| Radeon Hard disk 5550 (GDDR5) | February 2010 | Redwood | 320 | 550 | 352 | $70 |
| Radeon HD 5550 (DDR3) | February 2010 | Redwood | 320 | 550 | 352 | $70 |
| Radeon HD 5550 (DDR2) | February 2010 | Redwood | 320 | 550 | 352 | $70 |
| GeForce 8800 GTX | November 2006 | G80 | 128 | 1350 | 346 | |
| GeForce GT 630 (DDR3) | Apr 2012 | GK107 | 192 | 875 | 336 | OEM |
| GeForce 9800 GT | July 2008 | G92a/G92b | 112 | 1500 | 336 | |
| GeForce 8800 GT (512MB) | October 2007 | G92 | 112 | 1500 | 336 | |
| GeForce 8800 GT (256MB) | December 2007 | G92 | 112 | 1500 | 336 | |
| GeForce GTX 285 | January 2009 | GT200 | 240 | 648 | 311 | $400 |
| GeForce GT 630 (GDDR5) | May 2012 | GF108 | 96 | 810 | 311 | $80 |
| GeForce GT 440 (GDDR5) | February 2011 | GF108 | 96 | 810 | 311 | $100 |
| GeForce GT 440 (GDDR3) | Feb 2011 | GF108 | 96 | 810 | 311 | $100 |
| GeForce GTX 275 | Apr 2009 | GT200 | 240 | 633 | 304 | $250 |
| GeForce GTX 280 | June 2008 | GT200 | 240 | 602 | 289 | $650 ($430) |
| Radeon Hard disk drive 2900 GT | November 2007 | R600 | 240 | 600 | 288 | $200 |
| GeForce GT 730 (128-bit, DDR3) | June 2014 | GF108 | 96 | 700 | 269 | $69 |
| GeForce GT 530 | May 2011 | GF118 | 96 | 700 | 269 | OEM |
| GeForce GT 430 | October 2010 | GF108 | 96 | 700 | 269 | $79 |
| GeForce 9600 GSO | May 2008 | G92 | 96 | 1375 | 264 | |
| GeForce 8800 GS | January 2008 | G92 | 96 | 1375 | 264 | |
| GeForce GT 240 (GDDR5) | Nov 2009 | GT215 | 96 | 1340 | 257 | OEM |
| GeForce GT 240 (DDR3) | Nov 2009 | GT215 | 96 | 1340 | 257 | OEM |
| GeForce GTX 260 | September 2008 | GT200 | 216 | 576 | 249 | $300 |
| Radeon Hard disk drive 6450 | April 2011 | Caicos | 160 | 750 | 240 | $55 |
| GeForce 8800 GTS (640MB) | November 2006 | G80 | 96 | 1188 | 228 | |
| GeForce 8800 GTS (320MB) | February 2007 | G80 | 96 | 1188 | 228 | |
| GeForce GTX 260 | June 2008 | GT200 | 192 | 576 | 221 | $400 ($270) |
| GeForce 9600 GT | Feb 2008 | G94 | 64 | 1625 | 208 | |
| Radeon R5 230 | Apr 2014 | Caicos | 160 | 625 | 200 | |
| Radeon Hard disk 2600 XT | June 2007 | RV630 | 120 | 800 | 192 | $149 |
| Radeon HD 3650 (DDR3) | January 2008 | RV635 | 120 | 725 | 174 | |
| Radeon Hard disk drive 3650 (DDR2) | January 2008 | RV635 | 120 | 725 | 174 | |
| GeForce GT 520 | Apr 2011 | GF119 | 48 | 810 | 156 | $59 |
| Radeon HD 2600 Pro | June 2007 | RV630 | 120 | 600 | 144 | $99 |
| GeForce GT 220 (DDR3) | October 2009 | GT216 | 48 | 1360 | 131 | OEM |
| GeForce GT 220 (DDR2) | October 2009 | GT216 | 48 | 1335 | 128 | OEM |
| Radeon HD 5450 | February 2010 | Cedar | 80 | 650 | 104 | $50 |
| Radeon Hard disk drive 4550 | September 2008 | RV710 | 80 | 600 | 96 | |
| Radeon HD 4350 | September 2008 | RV710 | 80 | 600 | 96 | |
| GeForce 8600 GTS | April 2007 | G84 | 32 | 1450 | 93 | |
| GeForce 9500 GT (GDDR3) | July 2008 | G96 | 32 | 1400 | 90 | |
| GeForce 9500 GT (DDR2) | July 2008 | G96 | 32 | 1400 | 90 | |
| GeForce 8600 GT (GDDR3) | April 2007 | G84 | 32 | 1188 | 76 | |
| GeForce 8600 GT (DDR2) | April 2007 | G84 | 32 | 1188 | 76 | |
| GeForce GT 420 | September 2010 | GF108 | 48 | 700 | 67 | OEM |
| Radeon HD 2400 XT | June 2007 | RV610 | 40 | 650 | 52 | $55 |
| GeForce 9400 GT | Baronial 2008 | G96 | xvi | 1400 | 45 | |
| Radeon HD 2400 Pro | June 2007 | RV610 | xl | 525 | 42 | |
| Radeon HD 2300 | June 2007 | RV610 | xl | 525 | 42 | |
| GeForce 8600 GS | Apr 2007 | G84 | xvi | 1180 | 38 | |
| Radeon X1950 XTX * | Oct 2006 | R580+ | 48 | 650 | 31.two * | $449 |
| Radeon X1900 XTX * | January 2006 | R580 | 48 | 650 | 31.2 * | $649 |
| Radeon X1950 XT * | October 2006 | R580+ | 48 | 625 | thirty.0 * | |
| Radeon X1900 XT * | January 2006 | R580 | 48 | 625 | 30.0 * | $549 |
| GeForce 8500 GT | Apr 2007 | G86 | 16 | 900 | 29 | |
| GeForce 8400 GS | June 2007 | G86 | 16 | 900 | 29 | |
| GeForce 7950 GX2 * | June 2006 | 2x G71 | 48 | 500 | 24.0 * | |
| GeForce 9300 GS | June 2008 | G98 | 8 | 1400 | 22 | |
| GeForce 9300 GE | June 2008 | G98 | eight | 1300 | 21 | |
| Radeon X1950 Pro * | October 2006 | RV570 | 36 | 575 | twenty.7 * | |
| Radeon X1900 GT * | May 2006 | R580 | 36 | 575 | 20.seven * | |
| Radeon X1950 GT * | January 2007 | RV570 | 36 | 500 | 18.0 * | |
| GeForce 7900 GTX * | March 2006 | G71 | 24 | 650 | 15.half dozen * | |
| GeForce 7900 GTO * | Oct 2006 | G71 | 24 | 650 | fifteen.6 * | |
| GeForce 8300 GS | July 2007 | G86 | 8 | 900 | 14 | |
| GeForce 7950 GT * | September 2006 | G71 | 24 | 550 | 13.ii * | |
| GeForce 7800 GTX (512MB) * | November 2005 | G70 | 24 | 550 | 13.2 * | |
| Radeon X1650 XT * | October 2006 | RV560 | 24 | 525 | 12.6 * | |
| GeForce 7900 GT * | March 2006 | G71 | 24 | 450 | 10.8 * | |
| GeForce 7800 GTX (256MB) * | June 2005 | G70 | 24 | 430 | x.3 * | |
| Radeon X1800 XT * | Oct 2005 | R520 | 16 | 625 | ten.0 * | $549 |
| Radeon X1650 GT * | May 2007 | RV560 | 24 | 400 | 9.6 * | |
| GeForce 7900 GS * | May 2006 | G71 | 20 | 450 | 9.0 * | |
| Radeon X850 XT Platinum * | December 2004 | R480 | 16 | 540 | 8.6 * | |
| Radeon X850 XT * | December 2004 | R480 | 16 | 520 | viii.3 * | |
| Radeon X800 XT Platinum * | May 2004 | R423 | 16 | 520 | viii.three * | |
| Radeon X800 XT * | Dec 2004 | R423 | 16 | 500 | 8.0 * | |
| Radeon X1800 XL * | October 2005 | R520 | 16 | 500 | 8.0 * | |
| GeForce 7800 GT * | Baronial 2005 | G70 | xx | 400 | eight.0 * | |
| Radeon X1650 Pro * | Baronial 2006 | RV535 | 12 | 600 | 7.2 * | |
| Radeon X1600 XT * | October 2005 | RV530 | 12 | 590 | 7.one * | |
| GeForce 7600 GT * | March 2006 | G73 | 12 | 560 | 6.7 * | |
| Radeon X800 XL * | December 2004 | R430 | sixteen | 400 | vi.iv * | |
| GeForce 6800 Ultra * | June 2004 | NV45 | 16 | 400 | 6.iv * | |
| Radeon X850 Pro * | December 2004 | R480 | 12 | 507 | 6.1 * | |
| Radeon X1800 GTO * | March 2006 | R520 | 12 | 500 | 6.0 * | $249 |
| Radeon X1600 Pro * | October 2005 | RV530 | 12 | 500 | 6.0 * | |
| Radeon X1300 XT * | August 2006 | RV530 | 12 | 500 | vi.0 * | |
| GeForce 7800 GS * | Feb 2006 | G70 | sixteen | 375 | 6.0 * | |
| Radeon X800 Pro * | May 2004 | R423 | 12 | 475 | 5.vii * | |
| GeForce 6800 GT * | June 2004 | NV45 | xvi | 350 | 5.vi * | |
| GeForce 6800 GS (PCIe) * | Nov 2005 | NV42 | 12 | 425 | five.i * | |
| Radeon X800 GTO (256MB) * | September 2005 | R423/R480 | 12 | 400 | iv.eight * | |
| Radeon X800 GTO (128MB) * | September 2005 | R423/R480 | 12 | 400 | 4.viii * | |
| GeForce 7600 GS * | March 2006 | G73 | 12 | 400 | 4.8 * | |
| Radeon X800 * | Dec 2004 | R430 | 12 | 392 | 4.7 * | |
| GeForce 6800 GS (AGP) * | December 2005 | NV40 | 12 | 350 | 4.2 * | |
| GeForce 6600 GT * | November 2004 | NV43 | eight | 500 | iv.0 * | |
| GeForce 6800 * | Nov 2004 | NV41/NV42 | 12 | 325 | 3.nine * | |
| Radeon X800 GT * | December 2005 | R423/R480 | viii | 475 | 3.viii * | |
| Radeon X800 SE * | October 2004 | R420 | 8 | 425 | 3.4 * | |
| Radeon X700 Pro * | December 2004 | RV410 | eight | 425 | 3.4 * | |
| Radeon 9800 XT * | September 2003 | R360 | 8 | 412 | 3.3 * | |
| Radeon X700 * | September 2005 | RV410 | 8 | 400 | iii.two * | |
| Radeon 9800 Pro * | March 2003 | R350 | eight | 380 | three.0 * | |
| GeForce 7300 GT (GDDR3) * | May 2006 | G73 | 8 | 350 | 2.8 * | |
| GeForce 7300 GT (DDR2) * | May 2006 | G73 | 8 | 350 | ii.8 * | |
| Radeon 9800 SE (128-bit) * | March 2003 | R350 | 8 | 325 | ii.6 * | |
| Radeon 9800 * | March 2003 | R350 | viii | 325 | 2.half dozen * | |
| Radeon 9700 Pro * | July 2002 | R300 | 8 | 325 | two.half dozen * | |
| GeForce 6800 XT * | September 2005 | NV42 | 8 | 325 | 2.6 * | |
| GeForce 6800 LE * | January 2005 | NV41/NV42 | viii | 325 | ii.six * | |
| Radeon X1300 Pro * | October 2005 | RV515 | 4 | 600 | two.4 * | |
| GeForce 6600 (128-bit) * | August 2004 | NV43 | viii | 300 | 2.iv * | |
| Radeon 9700 * | October 2002 | R300 | 8 | 275 | 2.2 * | |
| Radeon 9500 Pro * | October 2002 | R300 | viii | 275 | 2.two * | |
| GeForce 7300 GS * | January 2006 | G72 | 4 | 550 | 2.2 * | |
| Radeon X600 XT * | September 2004 | RV380 | 4 | 500 | 2.0 * | |
| Radeon X1550 * | Jan 2007 | RV516 | 4 | 500 | 2.0 * | |
| Radeon 9600 XT * | September 2003 | RV360 | iv | 500 | 2.0 * | |
| GeForce FX 5800 Ultra * | January 2003 | NV30 | 4 | 500 | 2.0 * | |
| GeForce FX 5950 Ultra * | Oct 2003 | NV38 | 4 | 475 | 1.9 * | |
| GeForce FX 5700 Ultra * | October 2003 | NV36 | 4 | 475 | 1.9 * | |
| GeForce FX 5900 Ultra * | May 2003 | NV35 | iv | 450 | i.eight * | |
| GeForce FX 5700 * | October 2003 | NV36 | 4 | 425 | 1.seven * | |
| Radeon X600 Pro * | September 2004 | RV370 | 4 | 400 | 1.half-dozen * | |
| Radeon X600 Pro * | September 2004 | RV380 | 4 | 400 | one.6 * | |
| Radeon X600 * | September 2004 | RV370 | four | 400 | i.vi * | |
| Radeon 9600 Pro * | March 2003 | RV350 | 4 | 400 | 1.6 * | |
| GeForce FX 5900 XT * | December 2003 | NV35 | 4 | 390 | 1.half dozen * | |
| GeForce FX 5900 * | May 2003 | NV35 | 4 | 400 | 1.half dozen * | |
| GeForce FX 5800 * | January 2003 | NV30 | 4 | 400 | one.half dozen * | |
| GeForce FX 5600 Ultra * | March 2003 | NV31 | four | 400 | 1.6 * | |
| Radeon 9800 SE (256-flake) * | March 2003 | R350 | iv | 380 | one.v * | |
| GeForce 7300 LE * | March 2006 | G72 | 4 | 350 | ane.4 * | |
| GeForce 6200 TurboCache * | December 2004 | NV44 | 4 | 350 | 1.iv * | |
| Radeon 9600 SE * | September 2003 | RV350 | 4 | 325 | i.3 * | |
| Radeon 9600 * | September 2003 | RV350 | 4 | 325 | i.iii * | |
| GeForce FX 5600 * | March 2003 | NV31 | iv | 325 | i.3 * | |
| GeForce FX 5200 Ultra * | March 2003 | NV34 | iv | 325 | 1.3 * | |
| GeForce 6600 LE * | June 1905 | NV43 | 4 | 325 | 1.3 * | |
| Radeon X300 SE * | September 2004 | RV370 | four | 300 | 1.2 * | |
| GeForce 6200 * | October 2004 | NV43 | 4 | 300 | 1.2 * | |
| GeForce 4 Ti4800 * | January 2003 | NV28 | 4 | 300 | 1.2 * | |
| GeForce 4 Ti4600 * | February 2002 | NV25 | 4 | 300 | 1.two * | |
| Radeon 9500 * | Oct 2002 | R300 | 4 | 275 | one.1 * | |
| Radeon 8500 * | Baronial 2001 | R200 | four | 275 | 1.1 * | |
| GeForce FX 5500 * | March 2004 | NV34B | 4 | 270 | 1.1 * | |
| GeForce 4 Ti4800 SE * | January 2003 | NV28 | iv | 275 | 1.i * | |
| GeForce 4 Ti4400 * | February 2002 | NV25 | four | 275 | i.1 * | |
| Radeon X1050 (128-bit) * | Dec 2006 | RV350 | 4 | 250 | ane.0 * | |
| Radeon 9550 * | January 2004 | RV350 | iv | 250 | 1.0 * | |
| Radeon 9250 * | March 2004 | RV280 | iv | 240 | 1.0 * | |
| Radeon 9200 * | April 2003 | RV280 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 * | |
| Radeon 9100 * | Apr 2003 | R200 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 * | |
| Radeon 9000 * | August 2002 | RV250 | four | 250 | i.0 * | |
| GeForce FX 5700 LE * | March 2004 | NV36 | 4 | 250 | ane.0 * | |
| GeForce FX 5200 (64-bit) * | March 2003 | NV34 | four | 250 | 1.0 * | |
| GeForce FX 5200 (128-bit) * | March 2003 | NV34 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 * | |
| GeForce 4 Ti4200 * | Apr 2002 | NV25 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 * | |
| GeForce 3 Ti500 * | Oct 2001 | NV20 | four | 240 | 1.0 * | |
| GeForce 2 Ultra * | August 2000 | NV16 | iv | 250 | 1.0 * | |
| GeForce two Ti * | October 2001 | NV15 | 4 | 250 | 1.0 * | |
| GeForce 7200 GS * | Jan 2006 | G72 | 2 | 450 | 0.9 * | |
| Radeon X300 * | September 2004 | RV370 | 4 | 200 | 0.8 * | |
| Radeon 9200 SE * | March 2003 | RV280 | 4 | 200 | 0.8 * | |
| GeForce 3 * | February 2001 | NV20 | 4 | 200 | 0.8 * | |
| GeForce 2 GTS * | April 2000 | NV15 | 4 | 200 | 0.8 * | |
| GeForce 3 Ti200 * | October 2001 | NV20 | 4 | 175 | 0.7 * | |
| Radeon 7500 * | August 2001 | RV200 | 2 | 290 | 0.6 * | |
| GeForce 4 MX460 * | February 2002 | NV17 | 2 | 300 | 0.6 * | |
| GeForce 4 MX440 * | February 2002 | NV17 | 2 | 275 | 0.6 * | |
| Rage Fury MAXX * | Oct 1999 | 2x ATI Rage | four | 125 | 0.v * | |
| GeForce four MX420 * | February 2002 | NV17 | 2 | 250 | 0.5 * | |
| GeForce 256 SDR * | October 1999 | NV10 | 4 | 120 | 0.5 * | |
| GeForce 256 DDR * | Dec 1999 | NV10 | 4 | 120 | 0.five * | |
| GeForce ii MX400 * | March 2001 | NV11 | two | 200 | 0.4 * | |
| GeForce ii MX200 * | March 2001 | NV11 | 2 | 175 | 0.iv * | |
| Rage 128 Ultra * | Baronial 1999 | ATI Rage | two | 130 | 0.iii * | |
| Rage 128 Pro * | Baronial 1999 | ATI Rage | 2 | 125 | 0.3 * | |
| Radeon SDR * | June 2000 | R100 | two | 166 | 0.iii * | |
| Radeon LE * | May 2001 | R100 | 2 | 150 | 0.three * | |
| Radeon DDR * | April 2000 | R100 | ii | 166 | 0.3 * | |
| Radeon 7200 SDR * | June 2000 | R100 | 2 | 166 | 0.three * | |
| Radeon 7200 DDR * | April 2000 | R100 | 2 | 166 | 0.three * | |
| Nvidia Riva TNT2 Ultra * | March 1999 | NV5 | two | 150 | 0.3 * | |
| Nvidia Riva TNT2 Pro * | October 1999 | NV5 | two | 143 | 0.3 * | |
| Nvidia Riva TNT2 * | March 1999 | NV5 | 2 | 125 | 0.3 * | |
| Rage 128 GL * | August 1998 | ATI Rage | 2 | 103 | 0.2 * | |
| Radeon 7000 * | February 2001 | RV100 | one | 183 | 0.ii * | |
| Nvidia Riva TNT * | June 1998 | NV4 | two | 90 | 0.ii * | |
| Nvidia Riva 128 * | August 1997 | NV3 | 1 | 100 | 0.1 * |
* - Denotes functioning measured in gigaoperations per second, as opposed to GFLOPS. Older GPU architectures without unified shader back up aren't directly comparable with newer architectures.
Finding Discounts on the Best Graphics Cards
With all the GPU shortages these days, you're unlikely to meet huge sales on a graphics card, just you lot may find some savings by checking out the latest Newegg promo codes, All-time Buy promo codes and Micro Centre coupon codes.
For even more information, bank check out ourGraphics Menu Buyer's Guide.
More than: Best Graphics Cards for Gaming
More than: Graphics Carte Power Consumption Tested
More than: How to Stress-Examination Graphics Cards (Similar We Practise)
MORE: CPU Benchmarks
Want to annotate on this story? Permit us know what y'all think in the Tom's Hardware Forums .
Source: https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gpu-hierarchy,4388.html
0 Response to "Amd Vs Nvidia Benchmarks 2016"
Post a Comment